DOLAR
12,4902
EURO
14,1332
ALTIN
720,04
BIST
1.776
Adana Adıyaman Afyon Ağrı Aksaray Amasya Ankara Antalya Ardahan Artvin Aydın Balıkesir Bartın Batman Bayburt Bilecik Bingöl Bitlis Bolu Burdur Bursa Çanakkale Çankırı Çorum Denizli Diyarbakır Düzce Edirne Elazığ Erzincan Erzurum Eskişehir Gaziantep Giresun Gümüşhane Hakkari Hatay Iğdır Isparta İstanbul İzmir K.Maraş Karabük Karaman Kars Kastamonu Kayseri Kırıkkale Kırklareli Kırşehir Kilis Kocaeli Konya Kütahya Malatya Manisa Mardin Mersin Muğla Muş Nevşehir Niğde Ordu Osmaniye Rize Sakarya Samsun Siirt Sinop Sivas Şanlıurfa Şırnak Tekirdağ Tokat Trabzon Tunceli Uşak Van Yalova Yozgat Zonguldak
Diyarbakır
Sağanak Yağışlı
14°C
Diyarbakır
14°C
Sağanak Yağışlı
Pazartesi Parçalı Bulutlu
16°C
Salı Parçalı Bulutlu
17°C
Çarşamba Gök Gürültülü
13°C
Perşembe Parçalı Bulutlu
12°C

IHD co-chair: Turkey chose not to provide relevant information to the European Council Committee of Ministers

23.09.2021
0
A+
A-

According to Öztürk Türkdoğan, Turkey has chosen to mislead the European Council Committee of Ministers with regard to its response to an application made by NGO’s regarding the implementation of an ECHR ruling on the execution of aggravated life sentences in Turkey.

Öztürk Türkdoğan, the co-chair of Turkey’s Human Rights Association (İHD) has stated that Turkey chose not to provide relevant information to the European Council Committee of Ministers in its response to the application made by a number of NGOs regarding a review of the implementation of a European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruling on the execution of aggravated life sentences in Turkey.

The 2014 ECHR ruling in the case of Öcalan versus Turkey had concluded that the solitary confinement imposed on Abdullah Öcalan, the leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), and the sentence that disallowed any possibility of conditional release, constituted a human rights violation.

Türkdoğan indicated that, even as the Committee of Ministers was expected to take up the matter at a meeting in December, Turkey has responded to it with “misleading information.”

“Turkey has referred to the provisions of the Law No. 7242, adopted last year, regarding the execution of prison sentences related to common criminal cases,” he said.

“However, everyone knows that there is a Counter-Terrorism Law in Turkey. There is an Article 17 of that law. (…) So, Turkey has provided an incomplete answer.”

He added that this response was probably sent in vain since it was apparent that the application was about the execution of prison sentences regarding terror offences: “Doesn’t the Committee of Ministers know that there is a Counter-Terrorism Law in Turkey? Isn’t it obvious that people who were convicted for offences defined in that law are subjected to a different execution regime? Of course, it is obvious,” he stated.

Türkdoğan also emphasised that the past report and recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) were disregarded by Turkey: “In 2019, the CPT visited the Imrali prison in Turkey. They had certain observations, followed by a series of recommendations. Turkey did not comply with these,” he observed.

According to Öztürk Türkdoğan, Turkey has chosen to mislead the European Council Committee of Ministers with regard to its response to an application made by NGO’s regarding the implementation of an ECHR ruling on the execution of aggravated life sentences in Turkey.

Öztürk Türkdoğan, the co-chair of Turkey’s Human Rights Association (İHD) has stated that Turkey chose not to provide relevant information to the European Council Committee of Ministers in its response to the application made by a number of NGOs regarding a review of the implementation of a European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruling on the execution of aggravated life sentences in Turkey.

The 2014 ECHR ruling in the case of Öcalan versus Turkey had concluded that the solitary confinement imposed on Abdullah Öcalan, the leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), and the sentence that disallowed any possibility of conditional release, constituted a human rights violation.

Türkdoğan indicated that, even as the Committee of Ministers was expected to take up the matter at a meeting in December, Turkey has responded to it with “misleading information.”

“Turkey has referred to the provisions of the Law No. 7242, adopted last year, regarding the execution of prison sentences related to common criminal cases,” he said.

“However, everyone knows that there is a Counter-Terrorism Law in Turkey. There is an Article 17 of that law. (…) So, Turkey has provided an incomplete answer.”

He added that this response was probably sent in vain since it was apparent that the application was about the execution of prison sentences regarding terror offences: “Doesn’t the Committee of Ministers know that there is a Counter-Terrorism Law in Turkey? Isn’t it obvious that people who were convicted for offences defined in that law are subjected to a different execution regime? Of course, it is obvious,” he stated.

Türkdoğan also emphasised that the past report and recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) were disregarded by Turkey: “In 2019, the CPT visited the Imrali prison in Turkey. They had certain observations, followed by a series of recommendations. Turkey did not comply with these,” he observed.

Medyanews

Sinews03

Yazarın Diğer Yazıları
Yorumlar

Henüz yorum yapılmamış. İlk yorumu yukarıdaki form aracılığıyla siz yapabilirsiniz.